_________________________________
Making Money $150 An Hour

I recently found out about this case when I was researching queer militancy for my Social Movements class at Central CT State University last semester. I am vice president of PRIDE, the university’s queer student group, and we are interested in doing an awareness event about the New Jersey 4.

Are any of the women who have been released so far doing speaking engagements? I read that Terrain went to California to do an event with Angela Davis recently. We would love to have one or more of them come speak at our university, but I have had trouble finding a way to contact them individually. If you could provide us with information on that, it would be very helpful.

Thanks!

Are any of the women who have been released so far doing speaking engagements? I read that Terrain went to California to do an event with Angela Davis recently. We would love to have one or more of them come speak at our university, but I have had trouble finding a way to contact them individually. If you could provide us with information on that, it would be very helpful.

Thanks!

transgender law center’s open letter to sf weekly’s Lauren Smiley
An Open Letter to the Editors of SF Weekly:
The Transgender Law Center (TLC) and the San Francisco LGBT Community Center are deeply disappointed
by the SF Weekly’s recent sensationalistic story, Border Crossers, by Lauren Smiley. While the author may
have intended to increase awareness of the challenges that transgender immigrants face, we found the article’s
language and framing to be offensive and misleading. By choosing to be titillating rather than informative, the
article fails to address the realities of violence, discrimination, and joblessness that transgender immigrants face
in their home countries and right here in our city.
TLC regularly hears from transgender people throughout the world who are experiencing life-threatening
violence and threats in their home countries. This year, we successfully represented a transgender woman who
was beaten, raped and tortured by the police in Brazil. Far from being an easy case, our client had to overcome
incredible, onerous challenges in her quest to find a safe place to live and work. Against all odds (and after
many months of violence), she was able to stay legally in the United States when she was granted withholding
of removal under the Convention Against Torture. More recently, we received a spate of inquiries from the
Middle East, where transgender people are being imprisoned due to their gender identity. State-sanctioned
violence against transgender people is forcing people to flee their homelands for the hope of a better life in the
United States. Instead of reporting on the chronic violence that transgender people face in many countries, the
SF Weekly chose to use hyper-sexualized images, discuss people’s bodies in intimate detail (referring to one
transgender woman as an “altar to silicone”), condemn sex workers, and misleadingly suggest that some of the
most vulnerable members of society are “milking” the impenetrable U.S. immigration system.
Although the article could have told a story of our immigration laws doing just what they were designed to do –
give asylum to people who are not protected by their home governments – it instead told a sensationalized story
framed by anti-immigrant advocates. The author relies on the “expert opinion” of Dan Stein from the anti-
immigrant Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). FAIR is notoriously biased against
immigrants and has the distinction of being listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The article also failed to adequately explain the many economic barriers that limit work options for transgender
people in the U.S., resulting in relatively high rates of survival sex in the street economy. TLC’s 2006 report,
Good Jobs Now!, a snapshot of the economic health of San Francisco’s transgender communities, showed an
unemployment rate of 35% among transgender respondents – compared to 4.7% among the general population
at the time. More than 57% of respondents reported experiencing discrimination in the workplace.

More recently, nearly 700 transgender Californians responded to a statewide survey TLC conducted this
summer. The results parallel what we found in 2006 – despite solid education rates, transgender people continue
to be isolated from the workforce at alarming rates. About half of the respondents say they have lost a job or
been denied advancement at work because of their gender identity. Fewer than half are working full time – even
though rates of higher education exceed that of the average Californian. This data reflects what we know to be
an epidemic of un- and underemployment, discrimination and stigmatization impacting far too many
transgender people (and disproportionately impacting transgender women of color). Economic marginalization
demands that community members take creative actions in order to survive; as a result, our 2008 survey found
that about 1 in 5 has experienced homelessness and about 1 in 4 has participated in the street economy.
To improve this sad reality, a handful of social service organizations throughout the city struggle to provide
counseling, housing and healthcare services to transgender people while their budgets are cut by the City, and
San Francisco’s Transgender Economic Empowerment Initiative works hard every day to connect our
community with good jobs even in the midst of economic crises.
There are many stories to be told about the issues facing transgender immigrants. There is a grave need for
California to invest in workforce development for transgender people. There is a grave need for our federal
government to continue granting asylum to survivors of unthinkable torture. There is a grave need for public
education about transgender lives. We urge the SF Weekly to tell these complex stories through more balanced
investigative reporting, rather than relying on sensationalist, tabloid-style journalism. To this end, we invite the
editors and author to meet with transgender community leaders and members, especially those from the Bay
Area’s Latina community, to better understand the real lives of transgender San Franciscans and immigrants.

Masen Davis Rebecca Rolfe
Executive Director Executive Director
Transgender Law Center San Francisco LGBT Community Center

Transgender Law Center The Center
870 Market Street #823 1800 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94102 San Francisco, CA 94102
415-865-0176 phone (415) 865-5555 phone
877-847-1278 fax (415) 865-5501 fax
info@transgenderlawcenter.org Info@sfcenter.org

4748 The People of the State of New York, Ind. 4361/06
Respondent,

-against-

Venice Brown,
Defendant-Appellant.
- – - – -
4749 The People of the State of New York, Ind. 4361/06
Respondent,

-against-

Patreese Johnson,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________

Gibbons P.C., Newark, NJ (Melanca D. Clark of counsel), for Venice Brown, appellant.

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York (Karen D. Thompson of counsel), for Patreese Johnson, appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Susan Axelrod of counsel), for respondent.
_________________________
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered June 14, 2007, convicting defendant Venice Brown, after a jury trial, of gang assault in the second degree and assault in the third degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of 5 years, unanimously modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the gang assault conviction and remanding for a new trial on that count, and otherwise affirmed.

Judgment, same court and Justice, rendered June 14, 2007, convicting defendant Patreese Johnson, after a jury trial, of gang assault in the second degree and assault in the first and second degrees, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 11 years, 11 years and 7 years, respectively, unanimously modified, as=2 0a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentences for the gang assault in the second degree and assault in the first degree convictions to 8 years each, and otherwise affirmed.

The evidence of defendant Brown’s participation in the crime is substantially similar to the evidence received at the same trial against codefendant Renata Hill. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our prior decision (People v Hill, 52 AD3d 380 [2008]), we conclude that the verdict as to Brown was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, but that Brown is entitled to a new trial on the gang assault charge because of the charging errors discussed in Hill. We find it unnecessary to reach any other issues raised by Brown.

Defendant Johnson, who personally stabbed the victim, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence establishing the element of serious physical injury. That claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. Even without the aid of expert testimony, the jury could have readily inferred from the victim’s testimony and medical records that his stab wounds to his liver and stomach were life-threatening (see e.g. People v Jones, 38 AD3d 352 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 846 [2007]). Johnson’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim relating to this issue is likewise without merit.

We find Johnson’s sentence excessive to the extent indicated.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 9, 2008

_______________________
CLERK